![]() He also said that when it came to the hypothesis that the virus came from a lab accident, “I do not believe that this assessment was extensive enough. The report raised questions that require further study, such as additional work to pinpoint the earliest cases of COVID-19, he noted in a March 30 meeting with WHO member states. Some explanations may be more probable than others, but for now all possibilities remain on the table, says WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “Scientific missions like these should be able to do their work under conditions that produce independent and objective recommendations and findings,” the countries wrote in the statement. ![]() That reaction comes amid reports that the Chinese government had a hand in the mission, controlling the sites the team accessed during the visit and the report’s wording. In a joint statement on March 30, 14 countries including the United States expressed concern that the WHO team was delayed and didn’t have access to original data and samples from people and animals. Sign up for e-mail updates on the latest coronavirus news and research ![]() The last scenario - that the virus began spreading among people following a lab accident - is “extremely unlikely,” the researchers wrote. The two leading scenarios, the team concluded, are transmission of the virus to people either directly from bats or, more likely, via an intermediate animal like a civet or raccoon dog.Ī third possibility is the virus got to people through contaminated frozen food products, which the team considers less likely but says merits further investigation. On that trip, 17 experts with the WHO teamed up with 17 Chinese scientists to assess four potential scenarios for the origins of the coronavirus. And questions about just how much access to potential evidence an international team of experts had on their 28-day trip to Wuhan, China, in January and February has cast a shadow on the findings. But officials can’t yet prove - or rule out - any scenario. The report, released March 30, tallies where the evidence currently points: The virus, called SARS-CoV-2, probably jumped to people from bats through another animal it likely did not come from a lab. A new World Health Organization report investigating the origins of the coronavirus has raised more questions than answers for how - and where - the virus that exploded into a global pandemic emerged.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |